<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>booleansplit.com &#187; k10d</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.booleansplit.com/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=k10d" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.booleansplit.com</link>
	<description>photos, tips, tricks, and thoughts from an avid amateur photographer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:24:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pentax SMCP-DA 35mm f/2.8 Macro Limited User Review</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?p=1048</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?p=1048#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 20:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1:1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm f/1.7 SMC-A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aperture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bokeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[close]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[every day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FA 35mm f/2 AL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field of view]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FoV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuji F200EXR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K100D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[k10d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K200D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K20D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Km]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manual focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portrait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resolving power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert S. Donovan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMCP-DA 35mm f/2.8 Macro Limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMCP-DA* 16-50mm f/2.8 ED AL (IF) SDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starburst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Woolverton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Ever since I started shooting DSLRs with APS-C sized sensors I have struggled to find the perfect go-to lens for the majority of my photos. I love the speed and image quality of my old A series 50mm f/1.7 but the lack of autofocus and relatively tight F0V (75mm equiv.) makes it less than ideal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-724" title="money1" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/money1.jpg" alt="money1" width="640" height="480" /></p>
<p>Ever since I started shooting DSLRs with APS-C sized sensors I have struggled to find the perfect go-to lens for the majority of my photos. I love the speed and image quality of my old A series 50mm f/1.7 but the lack of autofocus and relatively tight F0V (75mm equiv.) makes it less than ideal for a lot of my shooting. When <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stephenwoolverton/" target="_blank">my friend Stephen</a> said he was sending me his DA 35mm f/2.8 Macro Limited to take for a spin I was pretty sure that it was going to be the lens I have been looking for. I had read all the reviews so I knew that it was a sharp lens with top-notch build quality. All that remained was for me to live with it for a few days&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Pros:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em>Razor</em> sharp starting at f/2.8.</li>
<li>Virtually no flare and very low CAs or fringing.</li>
<li>Wonderful bokeh (especially during macro use).</li>
<li>Impeccable Limited build quality.</li>
<li>Smaller and lighter than most 1:1 macro lenses.</li>
<li>Durable*</li>
<li>Ultra close focusing capability.</li>
<li>Built-in lens hood.</li>
<li>Excellent bang-for-the-buck.</li>
</ul>
<p><em>*I didn&#8217;t test this lens&#8217; durability but my friend Stephen did. Within minutes of opening the box he <strong>dropped it</strong> from a height of 1M <strong>onto concrete</strong>. The filter mount ring took the brunt of the impact (note silver filed away area in these shots) but the function of the lens was not otherwise affected.</em> <em>Wow!</em></p>
<p><strong>Cons:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Slow focusing due to <em>extremely</em> long focal range.</li>
<li>Lack of focus limit switch (might correct previous point).</li>
<li>Focus ring spins during autofocus operation.</li>
<li>Included lens cap falls off too easily.</li>
<li><em>Extremely</em> limited stand-off distance at 1:1 magnification (read: &#8220;none&#8221;).</li>
<li>Diffraction may be a problem above f/8 with non-macro shots.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Turns out this is not the do-it-all lens I&#8217;ve been looking for. Now, before all you Pentaxians out there start accusing me of bashing Pentax again, let me explain&#8230;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The DA 35mm f/2.8 Macro Limited is one of the best <em>macro</em> lenses I have ever used. It absolutely blows everything away within 2 feet of the front of the lens. I love the natural look the 35mm (52.5mm equiv) FoV provides. I can easily see this being one of the best lenses available for shooting products in a studio setting. If I were still walking the floor at Asian electronics trade shows it would be my go-to lens (lots of close-up shots of products held in my hand). However, the things that make this lens so good at what it was designed to do also make it less than perfect for <em>my</em> everyday use. If your primary interest is up-close hand-held macro photography, look no further. Buy this lens. If, like me, you are thinking that this lens might double as a good medium focal length lens for everyday use, please read the rest of my review and decide for yourself:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span id="more-723"></span><strong>Build Quality and Size:</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-725" title="vs_kit_infinity" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/vs_kit_infinity.jpg" alt="vs_kit_infinity" width="640" height="480" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Here we see the DA 35mm f/2.8 Macro Limited focused at infinity along side the standard 18-55mm Pentax kit lens&#8230;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-726" title="vs_kit_macro" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/vs_kit_macro.jpg" alt="vs_kit_macro" width="640" height="480" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">and here we see the macro lens focused to its closest setting (0.139M)&#8230;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-727" title="vs_50" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/vs_50.jpg" alt="vs_50" width="640" height="428" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">and here along side my old A series 50mm f/1.7 lens. The point here? This is a <em>very</em> compact lens. Even when extended for close-up focus. Also, even with the rock-solid aluminum casing it weighs slightly <em>less</em> than the plastic kit lens (7.6oz vs. 7.8oz). There is absolutely no excuse for not being able to find a place in your bag for this lens.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I mentioned the focus ring in the cons. The double row of knurled rings just below where it says &#8220;PENTAX-DA 1:2.8 35mm&#8230;&#8221; in the photo above is the focus ring. It is very nicely damped in manual mode and features Pentax&#8217;s nifty Quick-shift Focus System to allow focus fine tuning in AF mode. The double-height ring provides a great grip for your fingers during manual focusing. However, since it takes up so much of the 35&#8217;s diminutive body, you have to be careful not to grab it accidentally when holding the camera with two hands (left hand supporting lens) if you don&#8217;t want to loose a little skin off your finger tips ;-)</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Otherwise, the build quality of this lens is superb. You&#8217;ll never question the $480 price tag once you handle one for the first time.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Image Quality:</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-729" title="macro_wide" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/macro_wide.jpg" alt="macro_wide" width="640" height="428" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Uncropped f/2.8 @ ISO 100 shot of dew on leaf (NOT 1:1 magnification).</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-730" title="macro_detail" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/macro_detail.jpg" alt="macro_detail" width="640" height="640" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>100% crop from the center of the first image.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The resolving power of this lens is amazing. I&#8217;m sure my old 10MP K10D isn&#8217;t even coming close to getting the most out of this baby. I&#8217;m not going to get into resolution specifics here. There are plenty of other websites that can confirm what I experienced first hand: this is one of (if not <em>the</em>) sharpest lenses you can hang on your K Mount. Here are a few shots I took with it <a href="http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=da%2035mm&amp;w=10687935%40N04" target="_blank">on my Flickr page</a>.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-731" title="aperture" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/aperture.jpg" alt="aperture" width="640" height="480" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The nine bladed aperture provides wonderful round bokeh at all aperture settings.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-732" title="starburst" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/starburst.jpg" alt="starburst" width="640" height="428" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">It also provides nice 18 pointed starbursts when stopped down for long exposure night shots (if you are so inclined to use it for such things). They are not quite a clean as the ones that come off of the <a href="http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=344" target="_self">DA* 16-50 f/2.8</a> but they are certainly an improvement over the kit lens.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-735" title="flare1" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/flare1.jpg" alt="flare1" width="640" height="428" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The DA 35mm Macro has a built-in retractable lens hood. Without the hood this lens produces almost <strong>no flare</strong>. Compare the example above with this similar one shot with the DA* 16-50 f/2.8:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-734" title="16-50_flare" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/16-50_flare.jpg" alt="16-50_flare" width="640" height="428" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Even though Pentax thoughtfully includes an excellent built-in lens hood with the DA 35mm Macro it doesn&#8217;t <em>need</em> one!</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Handling:</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-736" title="close_focus" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/close_focus.jpg" alt="close_focus" width="640" height="480" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The DA 35mm Macro requires you to get <em>very</em> close to your subjects to achieve maximum magnification. Here is the shot I took above while focusing at 1:1 on my kit lens with the 35 Macro:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-737" title="macro_lens_shot" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/macro_lens_shot.jpg" alt="macro_lens_shot" width="640" height="428" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Very close <em>indeed</em>. This is fine for shooting flowers, products and other static and aproachable subjects. If you want to shoot creatures that might not appreciate a lens pressed up in their face you might want to look elsewhere. The only real problem I had with this was the camera blocking light from my subjects. Being so close with the lens to the subject you&#8217;d pretty much need a studio and strobes to get enough light in there.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I&#8217;ve had experience with longer macro lenses that put you farther away from the subject and I have to say I prefer the up-close DA 35mm Macro. The wider FoV gives a more natural 3D look to the images and makes it easier to lock in focus while shooting hand-held.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">This incredible focus range (infinity to 0.139M) is the DA 35 Macro&#8217;s Achilles heel. It is very deliberate and accurate when shooting macro but becomes slow and laborious when taking snap shots. If the camera misses the focus point it will usually run all the way to one extreme of the focal range and then back to the focus point where (hopefully) it will lock on. If not, it will continue on to the opposite end of the focus range before heading back to try again. On a normal lens this &#8220;focus hunting&#8221; can be a bit annoying as the lens &#8220;ziiiip-ziiiips&#8221; back and forth before locking focus. On the DA 35 Macro focus hunting goes more like &#8220;ziiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiip, ziiiiiiiiiiiiiiip, ziiiiiip, ziiip-zip.&#8221; I missed a ton of snap shots with the kids while this lens oscillated back and forth the focus scale on me.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Don&#8217;t misunderstand me. I&#8217;m not saying the focus isn&#8217;t <em>accurate</em>. As all Pentaxians apparently already know, their DSLRs <a href="http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=695" target="_self">do not have the fastest autofocus system</a>. The DA 35 Macro exacerbates this problem considerably. Its deliberate focusing is an important feature for shooting critical macro shots in controlled conditions but is also the main reason why it isn&#8217;t a replacement for standard lenses for every day use. IMO there&#8217;s nothing wrong with being good at what you do and sticking to it.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-739" title="abby_portrait" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/abby_portrait.jpg" alt="abby_portrait" width="640" height="428" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">That being said, it is not to say that the DA 35mm Macro <em>can&#8217;t</em> be used for every day shooting. When more deliberate shooting is possible all the things that make this such a great macro lens also make it an excellent <em>portrait</em> lens. Most people do not recommend a lens this wide for portrait use. I found it to be great for portrait shots where you want the feeling of being up close and personal while getting a bit more of the scene into the shot for <em>context</em>. Like this:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-740" title="milling_portrait" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/milling_portrait.jpg" alt="milling_portrait" width="640" height="428" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Of course what&#8217;s working for me here most are the 35mm focal length and the sharpness. If you are willing to give up the macro performance there are <a href="http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=713" target="_self">other lenses</a> that can likely better serve as wide angle portrait lenses.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-738" title="cap-removal" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/cap-removal.jpg" alt="cap-removal" width="640" height="480" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The only head scratcher for me with the DA 35mm Macro is Pentax&#8217;s choice in lens cap. The included cap is machined from aluminum and velvet lined. While this gives it a distinctly premium look and feel, it kept falling off the lens while in my bag. Also, it is easily knocked off while the camera is hanging on your shoulder strap. When I buy one of these lenses I will add a spring clip style 49mm lens cap to my order.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-741" title="k10d_no_grip" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/k10d_no_grip.jpg" alt="k10d_no_grip" width="640" height="480" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Pentax K10D with DA 35mm f/2.8 Macro Limited lens.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">So, the DA 35mm Macro does what it does and does it quite well. Just don&#8217;t expect it to do <em>all</em> things equally as well. If you need/want and excellent <em>macro</em> lens then you&#8217;d be hard pressed to do much better. If you are looking for a good normal lens for taking those every day shots do what I did and pick up an FA 35mm f/2 AL <strong>while you still can</strong>. It was a close call for me. I had $500 to spend so I could have gotten the macro lens, but I decided to go with the slightly faster FA lens instead. So far I am quite pleased with my decision- though I really miss the DA 35mm Macro&#8217;s build quality and ability to get in close. I can easily justify getting the DA 35mm Macro for use as a dedicated macro/studio lens later on to round out my lens collection.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/booleansplit/PentaxDA35mmF28MacroLtdSet?authkey=Gv1sRgCKfNqeX-3KOx9wE&amp;feat=directlink" target="_blank">Some sample shots I took with the DA 35mm Macro while testing it for this review.</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>About the shots for this post:</strong> I shot the studio shots for this post using <a href="http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/f/finepix_f200exr/index.html" target="_blank">Fuji&#8217;s new F200EXR</a> point-and-shoot camera. I&#8217;m not a big fan of PnS cameras but this little wonder has definitely gotten my attention. These shots are straight out of the camera at <strong><em>ISO 800</em></strong>. The camera&#8217;s various manual controls allowed me to get the exposure and WB right while the high ISO capability meant I could still go hand-held to knock the shots out quickly. BTW, this shot of the F200EXR was taken with the DA 35mm Macro. See what I mean about it being ideal for product photography?</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-742" title="fuji_f200exr" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/fuji_f200exr.jpg" alt="fuji_f200exr" width="640" height="428" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.booleansplit.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=723</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>new toy</title>
		<link>http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=713</link>
		<comments>http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=713#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B&H Photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discontinued]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FA 35mm f/2 AL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast fifty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field of view]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FoV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[k10d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kitchen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peanuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert S. Donovan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Mr. UPS brought my new Pentax FA 35mm f/2 AL lens today. It has an equivalent field of view on my K10d of 52.5mm, making it the closest you can get to a real &#8220;fast fifty&#8221; FoV on a Pentax DSLR. This lens has been discontinued by Pentax so I figured I&#8217;d better snap one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="I love the smell... by Robert S. Donovan (booleansplit), on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/booleansplit/3408431756/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3318/3408431756_4f7354ba69_o.jpg" alt="I love the smell..." width="1000" height="669" /></a></p>
<p>Mr. UPS brought my new Pentax FA 35mm f/2 AL lens today. It has an equivalent field of view on my K10d of 52.5mm, making it the closest you can get to a real &#8220;fast fifty&#8221; FoV on a Pentax DSLR. This lens has been discontinued by Pentax so I figured I&#8217;d better snap one up while I could. I paid $330 from <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/" target="_blank">B&amp;H</a> with free shipping. Good thing I acted when I did because it&#8217;s now <em>not even listed</em> on their site any more&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be testing it over the next few days for my review. Here&#8217;s a shot of the kit (shot in <a href="http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=86" target="_self">my kitchen studio</a>):</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-715" title="imgp14281" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp14281.jpg" alt="imgp14281" width="1000" height="761" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;m really digging the lens hood (and thus planning a new center-pinch lens cap purchace).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.booleansplit.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=713</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christmas tree photo tutorial</title>
		<link>http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=205</link>
		<comments>http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=205#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[booleansplit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[k10d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[living room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[night]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small aperture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tutorial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
With Christmas just a couple of days away there is no doubt that many of you have been enjoying taking artistic photos of your Christmas tree and other Holiday decor. All those colorful and tiny lights make perfect bokeh fodder. And highly processed detail shots like this are also fun.
Problem is, many of us (present [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-206" title="Christmas ornament detail" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp6568.jpg" alt="Christmas ornament detail" width="640" height="428" /></p>
<p>With Christmas just a couple of days away there is no doubt that many of you have been enjoying taking artistic photos of your Christmas tree and other Holiday decor. All those colorful and tiny lights make perfect <a title="DSLR Bokeh Tutorial" href="http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=39" target="_blank">bokeh fodder</a>. And highly processed detail shots like this are also fun.</p>
<p>Problem is, many of us (present company included) forget to take good documentary photos of our holiday decor that we can pull out and reminisce over with the grand kids 30 years from now. While all those artsy detail shots are nice, none of them capture the full majesty of your 2008 Holiday decor. Going through my photos a few days ago I ran across this image I took of my mom&#8217;s Christmas tree back in 2005:</p>
<p><a title="IMG_0096_2 by booleansplit, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/booleansplit/1297870931/"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1303/1297870931_5fb08c6793.jpg" alt="IMG_0096_2" width="333" height="500" /></a></p>
<p>This is one of my favorite Christmas photos of all time. Even in black and white (shot in B&amp;W mode so there is no color version) I can totally feel the warmth of the twinkle lights and even smell the fresh pine fragrance of the Frasier fir tree. With this in mind I decided to figure out what makes good Christmas tree photos and do a bit of a tutorial aimed at DSLR users while I was at it.</p>
<p><strong>Step 1: </strong>Turn off your flash!</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-207" title="flash tree" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp6581.jpg" alt="flash tree" width="428" height="640" /></p>
<p>Out of the box in Program Auto mode just about all DSLRs are going to pop the flash in an attempt to achieve &#8220;proper&#8221; exposure. While this may accurately capture the image, I doubt that anyone will find the results very warm and inviting.</p>
<p>Switch your camera into Program mode and turn off the flash. With the flash off you&#8217;re likely to get something like this:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-208" title="no flash, default settings" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp6580.jpg" alt="no flash, default settings" width="428" height="640" /></p>
<p>This is a 1/8 second hand-held exposure at <em>f</em>/3.5 and ISO 400. I actually had to dial in +1EV of exposure compensation because my Pentax K10D&#8217;s matrix metering was underexposing the image considerably trying to compensate for the brightness of the tree lights and lamp to the right just off frame. While the image more accurately captures the look and feel of the decorated tree, it isn&#8217;t very dynamic and compelling.</p>
<p><strong>Steps 2 &amp; 3:</strong> Get out the tripod and close down the aperture.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-209" title="small aperture, long exposure" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp6576.jpg" alt="small aperture, long exposure" width="428" height="640" /></p>
<p>This shot is essentially identical to the previous shot except it is a 15 second exposure at <em>f</em>/16 and ISO 100 (shot in Aperture Priority mode). The small aperture does three things here. First it creates all those dreamy starbursts. Second, and more notably, it forces a long exposure. This long exposure time pulls in more ambient light, giving the entire scene more apparent dynamic range. Finally, it sharpens up the details. Zooming into this image you will find much crisper detail than the rather soft previous <em>f</em>/3.5 shot. As a bonus, using a lower ISO means richer colors, better detail, smoother gradients, and less noise.</p>
<p><strong>Step 4:</strong> Attend to the details.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-210" title="improved details" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp6646.jpg" alt="improved details" width="428" height="640" /></p>
<p>While the previous shot had come a long way from the Program Automatic blown-out flash shot, I felt there was still room for improvement. I didn&#8217;t like the reflections in the windows behind the tree coming from the upstairs lights and the lamp to the right was a bit harsh. Also, there were a few unsightly items cluttering up the foreground of the earlier shots and I wanted to add a better sense of grandeur to the shot.</p>
<p>For this final shot I turned off all the lights in the house except for a single 60 watt desk lamp behind the camera to add just a tad of ambient fill to the high ceilings. I moved the dog kennel and Where&#8217;s Waldo book. I then repositioned the tripod closer to the tree and lower before zooming out wider to exaggerate the scale of the tree and height of the room. This ended up being a 10 second exposure at <em>f</em>/16 and ISO 200- I bumped the ISO to 200 because the rest of the family was complaining about sitting in the dark during all my 20+ second shots ;-)</p>
<p>RAW file post processing in Lightroom was limited to setting the white balance (tungsten) and dialing in a bit of Sharpness, Clarity and Vibrance. You may want to tweak the Recovery slider a tad to compensate for any blown-out Christmas lights from the long exposure.</p>
<p>While I recommend shooting your Christmas tree photos at night,  depending upon the situation, decent results can be achieved during the day. The wall of windows behind the tree here made daytime shots pretty much impossible. However, waiting until dusk I got this shot which was pretty nice:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-213" title="Christmas tree at dusk" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp6566.jpg" alt="Christmas tree at dusk" width="428" height="640" /></p>
<p><strong>Step 5:</strong> Share!</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-222" title="my Christmas tree" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp6451.jpg" alt="my Christmas tree" width="640" height="428" /></p>
<p>This is a picture of <em>my</em> Christmas tree I took last week using the small aperture/long exposure technique described above. The photos for this tutorial were shot at my in-laws house. When you travel to visit friends and family this Christmas be sure to pack your camera and tripod. Take pictures of your non-photographer friends&#8217; trees and send them a copy as a Holiday treat! Tis the season of giving, right?</p>
<p>Merry Christmas!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.booleansplit.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=205</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christmas table centerpiece photo</title>
		<link>http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=194</link>
		<comments>http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=194#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrangement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[booleansplit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[candles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[centerpiece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dining room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[k10d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soft box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[table]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tripod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
My father in-law asked me to take a picture of his Christmas table centerpiece arrangement so he could e-mail it to an out of town friend. My attempt at a quick snapshot didn&#8217;t meet my with my photographic standards so I spent the next hour playing with lighting to get the final shot above. This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-195" title="Christmas centerpiece arrangement" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp6639.jpg" alt="Christmas centerpiece arrangement" width="640" height="428" /></p>
<p>My father in-law asked me to take a picture of his Christmas table centerpiece arrangement so he could e-mail it to an out of town friend. My attempt at a quick snapshot didn&#8217;t meet my with my photographic standards so I spent the next hour playing with lighting to get the final shot above. This was a very challenging shot as I had to make do with what lighting I could find in the house. Here&#8217;s how I did it:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-196" title="first shot with ambient light only" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp6627.jpg" alt="first shot with ambient light only" width="640" height="428" /></p>
<p>First of all, my in-laws&#8217; house is DARK. <em>Dark</em> walls. <em>Dark</em> floors. <em>Dark</em> furniture. <em>Dark</em> lamps. You get the idea. Plus, it was night so the wall of windows to the left of the subject weren&#8217;t helping. Of course, I could have waited for morning but I always like a good challenge. Plus, I figured that if I got it right, a night shot would better capture the elegant and rich warmth of the table setting.</p>
<p>My first test shot was attampted with nothing but the incandescent  lamp light filtering in from the living room behind the camera. This required a 6 second exposure at  <em>f</em>/8 and ISO 400 (a tripod was used so my K10D&#8217;s IS was OFF). I used <em>f</em>/8 to ensure that the entire arrangement was in sharp focus while the background was blurred a bit. I like the <em>f</em>/8 shot because there is enough background detail to clearly place this shot in my in-laws dining room while the subject focus was nicely isolated. The lighting in this first shot was too flat. I wanted more subject isolation so I grabbed a floor lamp and placed it to the left of the camera and tried again:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-197" title="second shot w/ floor lamp at eye level" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp6629.jpg" alt="second shot w/ floor lamp at eye level" width="640" height="428" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-198" title="set-up for second shot" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/p1020340.jpg" alt="set-up for second shot" width="640" height="480" /></p>
<p>This set-up provided better subject isolation via lighting but the shadows seemed a bit harsh. I played around with a few combinations of settings and finally settled on 4 seconds at <em>f</em>/8 and ISO 100 but was still not happy with the results.</p>
<p>Recalling some <a title="studio lighting shots on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=10687935%40N04&amp;q=studio+lighting&amp;m=text" target="_blank">studio shots</a> that I did not long ago where I held a shaded lamp directly above my subjects, I decided to try holding the lamp above the centerpiece just out of the frame. I also turned off all the lights in the living room and opened the glass doors on the china cabinet behind the arrangement to eliminate the reflection of the lamp. Finally, I lit the candles to add another level of detail and ambiance to the shot.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-199" title="set-up for final shot" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/p1020344.jpg" alt="set-up for final shot" width="640" height="480" /></p>
<p>This set-up is what I used for the final shot. (Note use of lens hood to quell flare). I sped up the ISO to 200 to get a 1.6 second exposure at <em>f</em>/8. This was mainly because the lamp was a bit heavy to be holding up like this for 6 seconds but also because a shorter exposure helped cut down on the ambient light bleeding in to the background. While the shutter was open I slowly arced the lamp from left to right to paint the entire arrangement and blur the shadows. The resulting image (top) ended up with shadows that were much softer at the subject with a nice gradual fall off of the light into the background. I couldn&#8217;t have done much better with an actual soft box in a studio ;-)</p>
<p>With a nice looking exposure I pulled the image into Lightroom to adjust the white balance (2625K) and apply my standard Sharpness (14), Detail (51), Clarity (30), and Vibrance (+25) settings. I also pushed the Recovery up to 73 to help correct some over exposure of the reds and knock back the highlights on the shiny green leaves a bit. A bit of final cropping (always leave room for cropping!) and off the image went to my father in-law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.booleansplit.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=194</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flushed</title>
		<link>http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=86</link>
		<comments>http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=86#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm f/1.7 SMC-A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[booleansplit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Spitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corbieres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flickr Friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluorescent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fontsainte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Griffin Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gris de Gris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[k10d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kermit Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kitchen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kroger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rosé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s quick and easy to get studio quality lighting in your home with almost no additional expense. Here&#8217;s a quick look behind the scenes of this photo:

As you can see, all I did was set up a couple of white boards on the kitchen counter under a fluorescent light. I learned this trick when I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_87" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 810px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/booleansplit/3102650352/"><img class="size-full wp-image-87" title="flushed" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp5827.jpg" alt="ISO 200, 50mm, f/1.7, 1/60sec, IS on" width="800" height="536" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">ISO 200, 50mm, f/1.7, 1/60sec, +2 EV, IS on</p></div>
<p>It&#8217;s quick and easy to get studio quality lighting in your home with almost no additional expense. Here&#8217;s a quick look behind the scenes of this photo:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-88" title="kitchen &quot;studio&quot; set up" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp5829.jpg" alt="set up" width="800" height="536" /></p>
<p>As you can see, all I did was set up a couple of white boards on the kitchen counter under a fluorescent light. I learned this trick when I was Design Director at <a title="Griffin Technology website" href="http://www.griffintechnology.com/" target="_blank">Griffin Technology</a>. Most of the pre-2007 product shots were done this way on a cubicle desk using the fluorescent light under the overhead storage bin. I&#8217;m happy to say that today Griffin employs a <a title="Bradley Spitzer's Fickr page" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/handcolored/" target="_blank">professional photographer</a> and has a full photo studio.</p>
<p>For this shot I dialed in +2 EV exposure compensation to adjust for the all-white background. By shooting RAW I was able to simply click the white balance eye dropper tool in <a title="Adobe Lightroom product page" href="http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshoplightroom/" target="_blank">Lightroom</a> on the white background to dial out the color cast of the fluorescent light. I pushed up the exposure an additional +0.83 to get the high key look I was going for. Other than that, all I did was tweak the Vibrance a touch and added a bit of sharpening.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another composition using the same set up:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-89" title="kitchen &quot;studio&quot; wine shot 2" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp5823.jpg" alt="wine shot 2" width="800" height="536" /></p>
<p>By the way, the subject of these photos is the wonderful <a title="Fontsainte website" href="http://www.fontsainte.com/" target="_blank">Corbières Domaine De Fontsainte Gris de Gris 2007 rosé</a> imported by <a title="Kermit Lynch website" href="http://www.kermitlynch.com/" target="_blank">Kermit Lynch</a>. This is one of my absolute favorite wines. It has a unique combination of dryness and intense fruit flavors. I picked it up for less than $10 at Kroger. Real men drink rosé ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.booleansplit.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=86</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DSLR Bokeh Tutorial</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?p=702</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?p=702#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm f/1.7 SMC-A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alpha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bokeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[booleansplit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D40]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D70]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D80]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f-stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flickr Friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K100D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[k10d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K200D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K20D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert S. Donovan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XTi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It seems that many Flickrites out there are struggling to get good bokeh shots. The good news is that shooting bokeh is one of the easiest photographic techniques to learn. Unfortunately, it is also one of the hardest to master. Here I will attempt to get you started with the basics. You&#8217;ll have to do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/booleansplit/3079237573/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-55" title="bokehpalooza" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp53191.jpg" alt="bokehpalooza" width="480" height="480" /></a></p>
<p>It seems that many Flickrites out there are struggling to get good bokeh shots. The good news is that shooting bokeh is one of the easiest photographic techniques to learn. Unfortunately, it is also one of the hardest to master. Here I will attempt to get you started with the basics. You&#8217;ll have to do the mastery part on your own :-)</p>
<p>Bokeh (pronounced: &#8220;boke-aay&#8221; or &#8220;boke-uh&#8221;- I prefer the latter) is the out of focus or blurry areas of a photograph. Wikipedia has a much more <a title="Wikipedia definition of &quot;Bokeh&quot;" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh" target="_blank">detailed description</a> of the definition of bokeh that&#8217;s worth a read. On Flickr I find most people use the term to specifically describe out of focus highlights in a photo. For the purposes of this how-to we&#8217;ll focus (pun intended) on out of focus highlight bokeh.</p>
<p>The photo above made the <a title="Bokehpalooza Flickr Explore Front Page screenshot" href="http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/4tuUHOF1tzkOEu8_EttFkA" target="_blank">Front Page</a> of Flickr&#8217;s Explore last week. I wish I could say that this was a difficult and challenging shot that called upon all of my skills as a photographer. The truth is this was one of the easiest shots I took that night. These small aperture long exposure shots were a lot more difficult to get right:</p>
<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/booleansplit/3079237337/"><img class="alignnone" title="When those crazy nights come callin" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3061/3079237337_fcac3c83ab_s.jpg" alt="" width="75" height="75" /></a> <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/booleansplit/3098394466/"><img class="alignnone" title="Make wonderland out of this concrete jungle" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3266/3098394466_f4b4f5fba4_s.jpg" alt="" width="75" height="75" /></a> <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/booleansplit/3070215540/"><img class="alignnone" title="love forty" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3160/3070215540_4fb830c91e_s.jpg" alt="" width="75" height="75" /></a> <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/booleansplit/3069341279/"><img class="alignnone" title="Sloss at night, foggy" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3030/3069341279_e31efc82f9_s.jpg" alt="" width="75" height="75" /></a></p>
<p>The secret to shooting bokeh lies in its definition: <em>out of focus</em> highlights. You need three things to shoot bokeh: pin point highlights, a large aperture and a short focal distance. When I say pin point highlights I mean small light sources. Trying to shoot a large area of light like a window or fluorescent light does not typically produce the type of bokeh &#8220;balls&#8221; that we are looking for here. Small lights like Christmas twinkle lights are an obvious source, but any light source that is far enough away will become infinitely small and can produce bokeh. I find street and car lights in the distance at night make <a title="as the parking lot empties for the night the bokey fairies come out to play" href="http://flickr.com/photos/booleansplit/2925054265/in/set-72157605213710637/" target="_blank">wonderful bokeh</a>.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 226px"><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/booleansplit/2833756694/in/set-72157603582162922"><img title="Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7 SMC" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3013/2833756694_f6220689e1_m.jpg" alt="" width="216" height="216" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7 SMC</p></div>
<p>Next, we need a large aperture. For the novice, the aperture is the opening in the lens that controls the amount of light that makes it through the lens and shutter to the film/sensor. The smaller the <em>f</em> number (or <em>f</em>-stop) the larger the opening. This is usually expressed as <em>f</em>/5.6, <em>f</em>/4, <em>f</em>/2.8, <em>f</em>/1.4, etc. Read more about aperture <a title="Wikipedia definition of &quot;Aperture&quot;" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture" target="_blank">here</a>.  Typically the larger the aperture the larger the bokeh. Fast lenses below <em>f</em>/2.8 like my 20 year old manual focus Pentax-A 50mm <em>f</em>/1.7 SMC are ideal for shooting bokeh (and is the lens I use for most of my bokeh shots on Fickr).</p>
<p>That is not to say that one can not get great bokeh using lenses with a smaller maximum aperture like the typical kit lenses sold with most entry level DSLRs. The trick is to make sure you are using the largest aperture possible (smallest <em>f</em> number). To do this I recommend switching your camera into Aperture Priority mode (typically labeled &#8220;<em>A</em>&#8221; or &#8220;<em>Av</em>&#8221; on the program mode dial) and dialing in the smallest <em>f</em> number possible. With most kit lenses this will be <em>f</em>/3.5. Here is another Explore bokeh photo of mine shot with my kit lens at <em>f</em>/3.5:</p>
<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/booleansplit/3018626895/in/set-72157605213710637"><img class="alignnone" title="bright lights, big city" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3188/3018626895_0f2c8c42f1.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="500" /></a></p>
<p>The other reason that you want the largest possible aperture your lens is capable of is to ensure that your bokeh is round and not faceted. You see, most lenses use 5-7 straight aperture blades to create the variable opening in the lens. Bokeh takes on the shape and size of the lens opening so smaller apertures will produce smaller, faceted and generally less pleasing bokeh. There are exceptions to this rule as most high end lenses use curved aperture blades that keep the aperture opening round at all <em>f</em> stops. However, if you&#8217;re shooting with a $1,500 Canon L series lens I trust you already know how to shoot bokeh ;-)</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em>Aperture openings on a 6 bladed lens (mouse over for setting):</em></p>
<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-41 alignnone" title="f/1.7" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp2357-150x150.jpg" alt="f/1.7" width="150" height="150" /><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-42 alignnone" title="f/5.6" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp2353-150x150.jpg" alt="f/5.6" width="150" height="150" /><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-43 alignnone" title="f/22" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp2349-150x150.jpg" alt="f/22" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em>Bokeh shots at different aperture settings with this lens (mouse over for setting):</em></p>
<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-48 alignnone" title="f/1.7 bokeh" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp5319-150x150.jpg" alt="f/1.7 bokeh" width="150" height="150" /><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-49 alignnone" title="f/4 bokeh" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp5321-150x150.jpg" alt="f/4 bokeh" width="150" height="150" /><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-51 alignnone" title="f/8 bokeh" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/imgp5320-150x150.jpg" alt="f/8 bokeh" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p>The last component to getting good bokeh shots is the focus distance used. I have found that the shorter the focus distance to the foreground subject, the better the background bokeh I will get. The idea is to get as much distance between the subject and the bokeh producing highlights. Also, the closer you are focused to the camera the shorter the <a title="Wikipedia definition of &quot;Depth of Field&quot;" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_field" target="_blank">depth of field</a> (DOF) will be. This ensures those lights way off in the background will be nice and blurred out.</p>
<p>The focal <em>length</em> of the lens is also a consideration. Depth of field is basically a function of focal length, distance to subject and aperture. At a given aperture and distance longer focal lengths result in shorter DOF. A short DOF is what we need to effectively blur the background highlights to produce bokeh. Getting close to the foreground subject and zooming to the longest setting on your lens will likely put you where you need to be to capture killer bokeh.</p>
<p>Here we have an example of close focus on the foreground subject coupled with a wide open aperture and longer focal length to create bokeh from small lights in the background:</p>
<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/booleansplit/3097374586/"><img class="alignnone" title="its Christmas time again" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3253/3097374586_111e4c9602.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="500" /></a></p>
<p>When I took this shot I was at the minimum focus distance for my 50mm 1.7 lens (about 18-20&#8243;). The white (gold colored here) twinkle lights were on another Christmas tree approximately 8-10&#8242; behind the light bulb and branch I focused on. The other smaller colored bokeh highlights were from other lights on the same tree that I focused on.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>TUTORIAL:</strong></span></p>
<p>Now that I&#8217;ve rambled on ad nauseam<em><em></em></em> about all the intricate details of capturing bokeh, let&#8217;s get on to the part where <em>you</em> actually go do it!</p>
<p><em>For DSLR users (point &#8216;n shooters will have to wait for another tutorial):</em></p>
<ol>
<li>Set your camera to Aperture Priority mode (<em>A</em> or <em>Av</em> on the program dial).</li>
<li>Select the smallest possible aperture (<em>f</em>) number for your lens (should be ≤<em>f</em>/4).</li>
<li>Switch your camera to manual focus and manually adjust the focus to the closest setting.</li>
<li>Zoom your lens to somewhere around 50mm.</li>
<li>Find some nice points of light at a distance of 10&#8242; or greater from the camera (your Christmas tree is the perfect subject this time of year).</li>
<li>Fire away!</li>
</ol>
<p>If you get a shutter speed that&#8217;s too slow (ie: less than 1/30 second), try bumping the ISO up to 400 or more. If you do the Christmas tree thing what you should get is something like this:</p>
<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/booleansplit/2097637015/in/set-72157603598429865"><img class="alignnone" title="bokeh tree II" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2400/2097637015_84df8f0bb0.jpg" alt="" width="334" height="500" /></a></p>
<p>Depending on how dark the background is (darker usually = better) you might have to dial in some exposure compensation to get your bokeh to really pop. This image looks like it came out fine without any, but I often have to dial in +2/3 to +1 EV for my 50mm 1.7 on my Pentax K10D.</p>
<p>Next, try putting a subject of some sort in front of the camera at the minimum focus distance (or there about) with the bokeh highlights in the background. It&#8217;ll take a little playing around with subject matter and lighting (both foreground and background) but in no time you should be shooting bokeh like a pro! For more examples, be sure to check out my <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/booleansplit/sets/72157603598429865/" target="_blank">bokehliscious</a> set on Flickr.</p>
<p>Please let me know in comments if this is helpful to you and/or if you have any questions or suggestions. Also, feel free to post links of your bokeh attempts for everyone to enjoy. Thanks for stopping by.</p>
<p>Happy bokeh-ing!</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> This is my single most popular post on my blog. <em>Please</em> let me know what else you would like for me to share about bokeh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.booleansplit.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=39</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
