<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>booleansplit.com &#187; compact cameras</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.booleansplit.com/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=compact-cameras" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.booleansplit.com</link>
	<description>photos, tips, tricks, and thoughts from an avid amateur photographer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:24:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Enthusiast compact camera test</title>
		<link>http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=179</link>
		<comments>http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=179#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[booleansplit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon G7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dpreview.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enthusiast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LX2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LX3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dpreview.com has concluded their compact camera tests with a look at enthusiast cameras. The choice of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 as the overall winner is no real surprise to me. I picked up an LX2 back in February &#8216;07 in an attempt to replace my DSLR. I was incredibly impressed with the camera&#8217;s overall performance. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/" target="_blank">dpreview.com</a> has concluded their compact camera tests with a look at <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q408enthusiastgroup/" target="_blank">enthusiast cameras</a>. The choice of the <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q408enthusiastgroup/page6.asp" target="_blank">Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3</a> as the overall winner is no real surprise to me. I picked up an LX2 back in February &#8216;07 in an attempt to replace my DSLR. I was incredibly impressed with the camera&#8217;s overall performance. My biggest complaint (and the thing that caused me to return it in exchange for a Canon G7) was the heavy handed noise reduction at all ISOs that ruined the 100% magnified detail of my shots. I&#8217;m a pixel peeper so this was a deal breaker for me. Also, the separate lens cap was a huge annoyance. Otherwise, it was one hell of a camera packed into a realistically pocket-able form factor (unlike the G series Canons).</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-180" title="Panasonic Lumix LX2 test shot" src="http://booleansplit.com/wp-content/uploads/p1000012.jpg" alt="Panasonic Lumix LX2 test shot" width="576" height="324" /></p>
<p>Apparently, Panasonic has listened to the complaints of photographers like myself and made improvements to the image quality. Meanwhile, the solid build, wonderful wide angle Leica lenses, built-in IS, and user-centric controls continue to make the Lumix line one of my favorites. While I ultimately decided that an advanced compact camera was not a viable substitute for a DSLR, I <em>did</em> settle upon a Lumix for my pocket camera of choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.booleansplit.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=179</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Premium compact camera test</title>
		<link>http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=93</link>
		<comments>http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=93#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[booleansplit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon SD880 IS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dpreview.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuji FinePix F100fd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high ISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic Lumix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point & shoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Woolverton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleansplit.com/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dpreview.com (best digital camera review site on the web) has just posted their comprehensive premium compact camera test. No surprise that the Canon SD880 IS is a favorite. I have owned a number of Canon point-and-shoot (p&#38;s) cameras over the years- including the predecessor to the 880- and they have all performed at a very [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="dpreview.com home page" href="http://www.dpreview.com/" target="_blank">dpreview.com</a> (best digital camera review site on the web) has just posted their comprehensive <a title="link to dpreview.com test article" href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q408premiumgroup/" target="_blank">premium compact camera test</a>. No surprise that the <a title="dpreview.com SD880 IS review page" href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q408premiumgroup/page2.asp" target="_blank">Canon SD880 IS</a> is a favorite. I have owned a number of Canon point-and-shoot (p&amp;s) cameras over the years- including the predecessor to the 880- and they have all performed at a very high level in all areas. Anytime someone asks for a recommendation for a digital p&amp;s for a non-enthusiast I always point them towards the Canons. (BTW, I usually point enthusiasts toward <a title="dpreview.com Panasonic Lumix product page" href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Panasonic/" target="_blank">Panasonic&#8217;s Lumix</a> line of pocket cameras.)</p>
<p>The surprise here is that the Fuji <a title="dpreview.com F100fd review page" href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q408premiumgroup/page3.asp" target="_blank">FinePix F100fd</a> ended up the Editors&#8217; choice. It seems that Fuji has come a lot closer than the Big Brands to solving the high ISO noise problems typically associated with digital p&amp;s cameras&#8217; tiny sensors. I have zero experience with Fuji cameras but at under $300 on <a title="Amazon product page" href="http://www.amazon.com/Fujifilm-FinePix-F100fd-Digital-supported/dp/B0018SF5Q2/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1229108966&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank">Amazon</a> I might have to give it a shot as well as revising my recommendations. Chime in the comments if you have any experience with the Fuji p&amp;s cameras (or any other favorites).</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> Check out Stephen Woolverton&#8217;s <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stephenwoolverton/3130201503/" target="_blank">Flickr set of high ISO shots</a> from the F100fd he ran out and bought immediately after reading this blog post ;-) Absolutely amazing stuff. ISO 12,800 looks like my Pentax K10D DSLR @ 800. Maybe I should consider trading <em>down</em>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.booleansplit.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=93</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
